Key result
ARNI linked to ~14% lower risk of death or hospitalization vs. RAS blockers.
Why the study?
While ARNI therapy improves outcomes in HFrEF, its benefits in patients with concomitant kidney failure undergoing replacement therapy remain uncertain.
Does ARNI reduce the composite of all-cause mortality and any hospitalization in patients with HFrEF and kidney failure on replacement therapy compared to RAS blockers?
Cohort (n=4,295)
Yes
Does ARNI reduce the composite of all-cause mortality and any hospitalization in patients with HFrEF and kidney failure on replacement therapy compared to RAS blockers?
Hazard Ratio: 0.86 (95% CI 0.75–0.97)
Absolute Event Rate: 99.33% vs 118.5%
p-value: p=0.018
ARNI is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to RAS blockers in patients with HFrEF and kidney failure on replacement therapy, particularly when medication adherence is high.
ARNI may warrant consideration in HFrEF with kidney failure on replacement therapy; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
AIMS: Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy has demonstrated improved outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, its benefits in patients with concomitant kidney failure undergoing replacement therapy remain uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the National Health Insurance Service database, we identified individuals with HFrEF and kidney failure receiving replacement therapy who were prescribed either ARNI or renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers between 2017 and 2021. After applying inverse probability of treatment weighting, we compared 2104 patients on ARNI with 2191 on RAS blockers. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and any hospitalization. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, any hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality. During a median follow-up of 19.1 months, ARNI use was associated with a significantly lower risk of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-0.97) compared with RAS blockers. ARNI also showed a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.86), any hospitalization (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.89). Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent associations across age, sex, comorbidities and medications. Good adherence to ARNI was linked to a lower risk of the primary outcome, whereas non-adherence showed no benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Among HFrEF patients with kidney failure receiving replacement therapy, ARNI use was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality, any hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality compared with RAS blockers, particularly in those with good adherence to therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and kidney failure on replacement therapy (n=4,295). Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) vs. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality and any hospitalization within 2 years (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.97, p=0.018). ARNI use was associated with a 14% lower risk of the primary composite of all-cause mortality and any hospitalization compared with RAS blockers (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.97, p=0.018).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: