Key result
ARNI is linked to a ~66% lower risk of mortality and HF hospitalization versus standard treatment.
Why the study?
Real-world evaluation of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) use in a diverse HFrEF population was limited.
Does ARNI reduce the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization compared to standard treatment in real-world patients with HFrEF?
Cohort (n=187)
No
Does ARNI reduce the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization compared to standard treatment in real-world patients with HFrEF?
Hazard Ratio: 0.34 (95% CI 0.15–0.8)
Absolute Event Rate: 11.5% vs 28%
p-value: p=0.013
In a real-world Thai cohort, ARNI significantly reduced all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization compared to standard therapy in HFrEF patients, consistent with pivotal trial data.
Supports ARNI in real-world HFrEF; leaves open randomized confirmation of benefit.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has been revolutionized by angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI). ARNI has been shown to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in a large, randomized controlled trial. However, real-world evaluation of ARNI with a diverse population is still limited. METHODS: HFrEF patients receiving angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) or standard HF treatment at a university hospital in Thailand were prospectively followed-up from January 2015 to December 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Survival analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: During a follow-up period of 12 months, the primary outcome occurred in 10 patients in the ARNI group (11.5%) and 28 in the standard treatment group (28.0%) (hazard ratio 0.34; 95% CI: 0.15-0.80; p = 0.013). After adjustment for confounding factors, ARNI was significantly associated with a significant reduction in the primary outcome (HR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.13-0.82, p = 0.017). In addition, ARNI was also significantly associated with a decrease in the clinical signs and symptoms of HF, including dyspnea, orthopnea, and fatigue. Orthostatic hypotension was more frequently reported among the ARNI group than among the standard treatment group. The rates of target dose achievement were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In real-world practice, ARNI use was associated with a significant reduction in both clinical outcomes and symptom improvement, while orthostatic hypotension was more common in patients in the ARNI group than in patients in the standard treatment group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rattanavipanon et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=187). Angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) vs. Standard HF treatment (ACEIs or ARBs) was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality and/or hospitalization for decompensated heart failure (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.80, p=0.013). ARNI use was associated with a significantly lower risk of the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization compared to standard treatment (HR 0.34).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: