Key result
Coincidentally elicited vagal responses during radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal AF were not associated with a lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.46-1.28).
Why the study?
Do coincidentally elicited vagal responses during radiofrequency PVI reduce arrhythmia recurrence in patients with paroxysmal AF?
Cohort (n=291)
Do coincidentally elicited vagal responses during radiofrequency PVI reduce arrhythmia recurrence in patients with paroxysmal AF?
Coincidental vagal responses during radiofrequency PVI for paroxysmal AF are not associated with a significantly lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence.
No procedural changes indicated by coincidental vagal responses; leaves open whether intentional elicitation affects recurrence in randomized trials.
Vagal responses (VR) during left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment have been reported to be associated with less recurrences, presumably because they are a sign of ganglionated plexi modification. Our objective was to evaluate whether coincidentally elicited VR during left atrial ablation are associated with lower AF recurrence rates.This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective study of 291 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Vagal responses were defined as episodes of heart rate <40 bpm or asystole lasting >5 s elicited during energy application. Sixty-eight patients (23.4%) had a VR during ablation. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, mean recurrence-free survival was 449 days (95% confidence interval 411-488) in patients with VR when compared with 435 days (95% confidence interval 415-455) in those without (P = 0.310). The 12-month recurrence rate estimates were 25 and 27%, respectively. In an unadjusted Cox model, VR was associated with an odds ratio for recurrence of 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.46-1.28).Coincidentally elicited VR during radiofrequency PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF do not appear to be related to lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence. This may mean that, even if a VR is truly a sign of coincidental ablation of a ganglionated plexus, this does not necessarily mean that a therapeutic modification has been effected, at least to a degree associated with clinical benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Γιαννόπουλος et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=291). Vagal responses during ablation vs. No vagal responses was evaluated on Arrhythmia recurrence (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.46-1.28, p=0.310). Coincidentally elicited vagal responses during radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal AF were not associated with a lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.46-1.28).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: