Why the study?
Does predischarge exercise ECG testing reveal unrecognized clinical findings compared to physician impression in patients after myocardial infarction?
Does predischarge exercise ECG testing reveal unrecognized clinical findings compared to physician impression in patients after myocardial infarction?
Predischarge exercise ECG testing frequently reveals unsuspected angina, arrhythmias, and exercise limitations compared to clinical impression alone in post-MI patients.
May detect unrecognized post-MI abnormalities missed on clinical impression; leaves open impact on management and outcomes.
The clinical utility of predischarge exercise ECGs was assessed prospectively in 47 patients 17 +/- 2 days after myocardial infarction. The graded-interval ergometric exercise protocol was terminated at 450 kilopond-m/min (kpm/min), a heart rate greater than 75% of predicted maximum, or for established clinical indications. Prior to testing, the attending physician and resident indicated their clinical impressions with regard to anticipated (1) angina, (2) exercise capacity, (3) arrhythmias during limited exercise, as well as anticipated discharge medications and activity prescriptions. Ratings were compared to exercise results and consequent alterations in management noted. No complications were noted during the evaluations. Nine patients noted anginal pain during exercise; five were unsuspected by the attending physician or resident. Ten patients demonstrated significant ventricular arrhythmias. Four were receiving antiarrhythmic therapy. Severe limitation of exercise capacity (< 300 kpm/min) was noted in six patients, unanticipated in four. Where not contraindicated, routine use of predischarge exercise ECG testing is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard A. Stein (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: