Key result
Short-term dabigatran or rivaroxaban therapy resulted in no strokes, systemic embolisms, or major bleeding events at 30 days, similar to warfarin, in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion.
Why the study?
Does short-term dabigatran or rivaroxaban therapy prevent stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing electrical cardioversion?
Observational (n=115)
Does short-term dabigatran or rivaroxaban therapy prevent stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing electrical cardioversion?
Short-term use of dabigatran or rivaroxaban appears safe and effective compared to warfarin for patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation, with no thromboembolic or bleeding events observed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports short-term NOAC use around cardioversion; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background and Objectives: The efficacy of short-term novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy for electrical cardioversion has not been fully evaluated. This study sought to investigate the efficacy and transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) findings of short-term dabigatran or rivaroxaban therapy versus warfarin therapy in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. Subject and Methods: This registry study included patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent elective electrical cardioversion. We analyzed 115 patients (42 in dabigatran, 33 in rivaroxaban, and 40 in warfarin group) who were taking oral anticoagulants for maximum of 42 days. All patients underwent TEE before electrical cardioversion. The primary outcome was stroke or systemic embolism at 30 days. Another outcome was major bleeding. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between patients in the NOAC and warfarin groups. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 1.2±1.5 in the dabigatran group, 0.7±1.2 in the rivaroxaban group, and 1.1±1.3 in the warfarin group (p=0.918, dabigatran vs. warfarin; p=0.078, rivaroxaban vs. warfarin). None of the patients in this study had thrombi. There was no difference in the incidence of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast between groups (28.6%, 21.2%, and 22.5% in dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin groups, respectively; p=0.529, dabigatran vs. warfarin; p=0.895, rivaroxaban vs. warfarin). No strokes or systemic embolisms were observed during the 30-day follow-up period. There were no major bleeding events. Conclusion: The short-term use of dabigatran or rivaroxaban can be considered safe in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chun et al. (2015) conducted an observational in persistent atrial fibrillation (n=115). dabigatran or rivaroxaban vs. warfarin was evaluated on stroke or systemic embolism at 30 days. Short-term dabigatran or rivaroxaban therapy resulted in no strokes, systemic embolisms, or major bleeding events at 30 days, similar to warfarin, in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: