Why the study?
What are the principles of rate control and restoration of sinus rhythm in the treatment of acute atrial fibrillation?
What are the principles of rate control and restoration of sinus rhythm in the treatment of acute atrial fibrillation?
This review outlines the principles of managing acute atrial fibrillation, highlighting electrical cardioversion for unstable patients and a choice of rate or rhythm control for stable patients.
Guides acute AF decisions with cardioversion for instability and flexibility in stable cases; leaves open optimal strategies pending prospective trials.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a familiar arrhythmia seen in the emergency department and the general population. In the past it was treated in the majority of cases by controlling the ventricular rate, whether the AF is acute or chronic. However, ventricular rate control alone does not address the underlying problem and the patients still remain in AF, cardiac output and symptoms have not been optimally corrected. There is definite risk of thromboembolism. Restoration of sinus rhythm is the only way of resuming the normal conduction physiology of the heart and correcting these problems This article provides a review of the two major principles of rhythm treatment of acute AF: rate control and restoration of sinus rhythm. Transthoracic electrical cardioversion is the mainstay of treatment in haemodynamically unstable AF, whereas in stable AF, there is a choice between rate control and restoration of sinus rhythm, or they can be carried out in conjunction with each other.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fung et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: