In this paper I discuss an approach to language assessment development and use that is elaborated in Bachman and Palmer (2010) and Bachman and Damböck (Forthcoming). I will first discuss the genesis of our approach, some limitations of other approaches to validity/validation, and the basic premises of our approach. I will then discuss the uses of language assessments and the notion of accountability. I will then briefly describe an “assessment use argument” (AUA), as a series of claims and warrants, along with the qualities of the claims in an AUA. Finally, after a brief summary, I will address some questions that have been asked about our approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyle F. Bachman (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: