Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
PNAS review synthesizes cross-disciplinary evidence; leaves open cardiology-specific validation in prospective studies.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans the biological, physical, and social sciences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holland et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: