Key result
Dobutamine-CMR with myocardial tagging detected significantly more new wall motion abnormalities compared to dobutamine-CMR without tagging (35.1% vs 29.9%; P=0.002).
Why the study?
Does high-dose dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with myocardial tagging improve the detection of new wall motion abnormalities compared to without tagging in patients with chest pain?
Observational (n=211)
Does high-dose dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance with myocardial tagging improve the detection of new wall motion abnormalities compared to without tagging in patients with chest pain?
Dobutamine-CMR with myocardial tagging significantly improves the detection of ischemic wall motion abnormalities compared to standard dobutamine-CMR and identifies patients at low risk for future cardiovascular events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid ischemia detection on dobutamine-CMR; leaves open whether tagging improves outcomes or warrants routine adoption.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the value of high-dose dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with myocardial tagging for the detection of wall motion abnormalities as a measure of myocardial ischemia in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred eleven consecutive patients with chest pain underwent dobutamine-CMR 4 days after antianginal medication was stopped. Dobutamine-CMR was performed at rest and during increasing doses of dobutamine. Cine-images were acquired during breath-hold with and without myocardial tagging at 3 short-axis levels. Regional wall motion was assessed in a 16-segment short-axis model. Patients with new wall motion abnormalities (NWMA) were examined by coronary angiography. Dobutamine-CMR was successfully performed in 194 patients. Dobutamine-CMR without tagging detected NWMA in 58 patients, whereas NWMA were detected in 68 patients with tagging (P=0.002, McNemar). Coronary angiography showed coronary artery disease in 65 (96%) of these 68 patients. All but 3 of the 65 patients needed revascularization. In the 112 patients with a negative dobutamine-CMR study, without baseline wall motion abnormalities, the cardiovascular occurrence-free survival rate was 98.2% during the mean follow-up period of 17.3 months (range, 7 to 31). CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine-CMR with myocardial tagging detected more NWMA compared with dobutamine-CMR without tagging and reliably separated patients with a normal life expectancy from those at increased risk of major adverse cardiac events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuijpers et al. (2003) conducted an observational in known or suspected coronary artery disease (n=211). Dobutamine-CMR with myocardial tagging vs. Dobutamine-CMR without tagging was evaluated on Detection of new wall motion abnormalities (NWMA) (p=0.002). Dobutamine-CMR with myocardial tagging detected significantly more new wall motion abnormalities compared to dobutamine-CMR without tagging (35.1% vs 29.9%; P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: