Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan use in HFrEF was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53-0.93) and HF hospitalization (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.48-0.80) versus ACE-I/ARB.
Why the study?
The authors sought to assess all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization with sacubitril/valsartan compared to standard HF therapy in HFrEF patients using real-world data.
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with HFrEF compared to ACE-I/ARB in real-world settings?
Meta-Analysis (n=32,000)
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with HFrEF compared to ACE-I/ARB in real-world settings?
Effect estimate: RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.53-0.93)
Real-world data confirms that sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduces all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with HFrEF compared to ACE-I/ARB.
Supports sacubitril/valsartan preference in HFrEF; confirms real-world mortality and hospitalization benefits.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization with sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) compared to standard HF therapy in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) using real-world data. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for the observational studies published in English exploring the clinical outcomes of S/V use in HFrEF till March 14, 2022. Two independent reviewers assessed the quality and risk of bias of the included studies. A random-effect model was used to combine data. The outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization associated with S/V use in comparison to standard HF therapy. A total of 9 observational studies comparing S/V to Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I)/Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) in HFrEF were included in the systematic review, with more than 32000 patients included in the final analysis. Overall, S/V use was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.93, I2 = 83%) and HF hospitalization (RR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.80, I2= 94%). Similar to the landmark controlled evidence, real-world data of S/V use in HFrEF demonstrated a significant reduction in all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahhal et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) (n=32,000). Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Standard HF therapy (ACE-I/ARB) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.93). Sacubitril/valsartan use in HFrEF was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53-0.93) and HF hospitalization (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.48-0.80) versus ACE-I/ARB.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: