Key result
High-resolution DWI boosts detection of post-AF ablation acute brain lesions by ~40% vs standard imaging.
Why the study?
Left atrial catheter ablation carries a risk of brain embolism, but the impact of diffusion-weighted imaging slice thickness on detecting post-ablation ischaemic brain lesions was unclear.
Does high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (hrDWI) improve the detection of acute ischaemic brain lesions compared to standard DWI in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation?
Cross-Sectional (n=321)
Single-blind
Yes
Does high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (hrDWI) improve the detection of acute ischaemic brain lesions compared to standard DWI in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation?
High-resolution DWI significantly increases the detection rate of acute ischaemic brain lesions following left atrial catheter ablation compared to standard DWI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
hrDWI detects more acute brain lesions after AF ablation than standard DWI; leaves open whether additional lesions affect outcomes or management.
AIMS: Left atrial catheter ablation is well established in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) but associated with risk of embolism to the brain. The present analysis aims to assess the impact of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) slice thickness on the rate of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected ischaemic brain lesions after ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: AXAFA-AFNET 5 trial (NCT02227550) participants underwent MRI using high-resolution (hr) DWI (slice thickness: 2.5-3 mm) and standard DWI (slice thickness: 5-6 mm) within 3-48 h after ablation. In 321 patients with analysable brain MRI (mean age 64 years, 33% female, median CHA2DS2-VASc 2), hrDWI detected at least one acute brain lesion in 84 (26.2%) patients and standard DWI in 60 (18.7%; P < 0.01) patients. High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging detected more lesions compared to standard DWI (165 vs. 104; P < 0.01). The degree of agreement for lesion confirmation using hrDWI vs. standard DWI was substantial (κ = 0769). Comparing the proportion of DWI-detected lesions, lesion distribution, and total lesion volume per patient, there was no difference in the cohort of participants undergoing MRI at 1.5 T (n = 52) vs. 3 T (n = 269). CONCLUSION: The pre-specified AXAFA-AFNET 5 sub-analysis revealed significantly increased rates of MRI-detected acute brain lesions using hrDWI instead of standard DWI in AF patients undergoing ablation. In comparison to DWI slice thickness, MRI field strength had a no significant impact in the trial. Comparing the varying rates of ablation-related MRI-detected brain lesions across previous studies has to consider these technical parameters. Future studies should use hrDWI, as feasibility was demonstrated in the multicentre AXAFA-AFNET 5 trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hæusler et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Symptomatic non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=321). High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (slice thickness 2.5-3 mm) vs. Standard diffusion-weighted imaging (slice thickness 5-6 mm) was evaluated on Detection of at least one acute ischemic brain lesion (p=<0.01). High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging detected at least one acute brain lesion in 26.2% of patients compared to 18.7% with standard imaging (P < 0.01) after atrial fibrillation ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: