Why the study?
Do ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or combination therapy reduce mortality and cardiovascular events in adults with stable ischemic heart disease and preserved ventricular function?
Do ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or combination therapy reduce mortality and cardiovascular events in adults with stable ischemic heart disease and preserved ventricular function?
Adding an ACE inhibitor to standard medical therapy improves mortality and reduces myocardial infarctions in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and preserved ventricular function, whereas ARBs have less evidence of benefit and combination therapy increases harms without added benefit.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adding ACE inhibitors to standard therapy in stable IHD with preserved ventricular function; confirms mortality and MI reductions in Level 1 evidence.
BACKGROUND: Patients with ischemic heart disease and preserved ventricular function experience considerable morbidity and mortality despite standard medical therapy. PURPOSE: To compare benefits and harms of using angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs), or combination therapy in adults with stable ischemic heart disease and preserved ventricular function. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (earliest date, July 2009) were searched without language restrictions. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent investigators screened citations for trials of at least 6 months' duration that compared ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or combination therapy with placebo or active control and reported any of several clinical outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Using standardized protocols, 2 independent investigators extracted information about study characteristics and rated the quality and strength of evidence. Disagreement was resolved by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: 41 studies met eligibility criteria. Moderate- to high-strength evidence (7 trials; 32 559 participants) showed that ACE inhibitors reduce the relative risk (RR) for total mortality (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.94]) and nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR, 0.83 [CI, 0.73 to 0.94]) but increase the RR for syncope (RR, 1.24 [CI, 1.02 to 1.52]) and cough (RR, 1.67 [CI, 1.22 to 2.29]) compared with placebo. Low-strength evidence (1 trial; 5926 participants) suggested that ARBs reduce the RR for the composite end point of cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke (RR, 0.88 [CI, 0.77 to 1.00]) but not for the individual components. Moderate-strength evidence (1 trial; 25 620 participants) showed similar effects on total mortality (RR, 1.07 [CI, 0.98 to 1.16]) and myocardial infarction (RR, 1.08 [CI, 0.94 to 1.23]) but an increased risk for discontinuations because of hypotension (P < 0.001) and syncope (P = 0.035) with combination therapy compared with ACE inhibitors alone. LIMITATIONS: Many studies either did not assess or did not report harms in a systematic manner. Many studies did not adequately report benefits or harms by various patient subgroups. CONCLUSION: Adding an ACE inhibitor to standard medical therapy improves outcomes, including reduced risk for mortality and myocardial infarctions, in some patients with stable ischemic heart disease and preserved ventricular function. Less evidence supports a benefit of ARB therapy, and combination therapy seems no better than ACE inhibitor therapy alone and increases harms. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baker et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: