Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A fundamental challenge in digital product design is ensuring that actual mental models of users align with the intended functionality of the system. When discrepancies arise, usability can suffer, leading to inefficient interactions and reduced adoption. Usability testing lets development teams identify design problems in digital products by collecting qualitative and quantitative information. However, this technique is often not able to provide a panoramic view of the interaction with the system, especially when dealing with complex interfaces such as those used in geospatial search engines and we need to analyse the quantitative data compiled during testing. This work proposes to actively incorporate process mining into usability testing. We discuss the implications of process mining on usability testing using a case study performed at the National Geographic Institute of Spain, where a new geospatial search engine was under development. Twenty-one participants, ranging from novice to expert users, were recruited to perform a search task using the new geospatial search engine. The findings reveal that the mental model of users leans towards the archetype of a regular search engine rather than fully utilising the geographic functionalities provided by the platform, as intended by its designers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herrera-Murillo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: