Key result
LAT-AI predicts left atrial appendage thrombus with 0.85 AUC, outperforming LVEF and CHA2DS2-VASc.
Why the study?
TOE is routinely performed to rule out left atrial appendage thrombus before catheter ablation or cardioversion in patients on chronic OAC, despite causing discomfort.
Does a machine learning model (LAT-AI) based on clinical and TTE features improve the prediction of left atrial appendage thrombus compared to LVEF and CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients on chronic oral anticoagulation?
Population
Patients undergoing TOE before cardioversion or catheter ablation (n = 2827 training, n = 1284 external testing)
Comparison
LAT-AI model vs LVEF and CHA2DS2-VASc score
Design
13-site prospective registry-based model development and external validation study
Authors
Loading...
May support better LAA thrombus prediction than LVEF or CHA2DS2-VASc in anticoagulated patients; leaves open whether it safely reduces TEE use.
Cohort (n=4,111)
Yes
Does a machine learning model (LAT-AI) based on clinical and TTE features improve the prediction of left atrial appendage thrombus compared to LVEF and CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients on chronic oral anticoagulation?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.89)
p-value: p=< .0001
A machine learning model combining clinical and TTE features accurately predicts left atrial appendage thrombus, potentially allowing 40% of patients on chronic oral anticoagulation to safely avoid transoesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion or ablation.
Pieszko et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Left atrial appendage thrombus (n=4,111). LAT-artificial intelligence (AI) model vs. LVEF and CHA2DS2-VASc score was evaluated on Prediction of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAT) presence (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.82-0.89, p=< .0001). A machine learning model (LAT-AI) predicted left atrial appendage thrombus with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.89), outperforming LVEF and CHA2DS2-VASc score (P < 0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: