PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1999Anesthesia & Analgesia335 citations

Which Clinical Anesthesia Outcomes Are Both Common and Important to Avoid? The Perspective of a Panel of Expert Anesthesiologists

View Full Paper
AMAlex MacarioMWMatthew B. WeingerPTPhuong Truong

Structured PICO

Which clinical anesthesia outcomes associated with routine outpatient surgery are judged to occur frequently and to be important to avoid?

P
Population
72 expert anesthesiologists (56 completed the questionnaire)
I
Intervention
Delphi process survey rating 33 clinical anesthesia outcomes for frequency and importance to avoid
O
Outcome
Consensus rankings of clinical anesthesia outcomes based on frequency and importance to avoid

Expert anesthesiologists identified incisional pain, nausea, vomiting, preoperative anxiety, and IV discomfort as the most common and important low-morbidity outcomes to avoid in ambulatory anesthesia.

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Anesthesia groups may need to determine which clinical anesthesia outcomes to track as part of quality improvement efforts. The goal of this study was to poll a panel of expert anesthesiologists to determine which clinical anesthesia outcomes associated with routine outpatient surgery were judged to occur frequently and to be important to avoid. Outcomes scoring highly in both scales could then be prioritized for measurement and improvement in ambulatory clinical practice. A mailed survey instrument instructed panel members to rate 33 clinical anesthesia outcomes in two scales: how frequently they believe the outcomes occur and which outcomes they expect patients find important to avoid. A feedback process (Delphi process) was used to gain consensus rankings of the outcomes for each scale. Importance and frequency scores were then weighted equally to qualitatively rank order the outcomes. Of the 72 anesthesiologists, 56 (78%) completed the questionnaire. The five items with the highest combined score were (in order): incisional pain, nausea, vomiting, preoperative anxiety, and discomfort from IV insertion. To increase quality of care, reducing the incidence and severity of these outcomes should be prioritized. IMPLICATIONS: Expert anesthesiologists reached a consensus on which low-morbidity clinical outcomes are common and important to the patient. The outcomes identified may be reasonable choices to be monitored as part of ambulatory anesthesia clinical quality improvement efforts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Macario et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c157bc97d63156a5f4c7ahttps://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199905000-00023
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Which Clinical Anesthesia Outcomes Are Both Common and Important to Avoid? The Perspective of a Panel of Expert Anesthesiologists1999 · 238 citations
  2. 2Which Clinical Anesthesia Outcomes Are Important to Avoid? The Perspective of Patients1999 · 838 citations
  3. 3Which Clinical Anesthesia Outcomes Are Important to Avoid? The Perspective of Patients1999 · 697 citations
  4. 4Perspectives on ambulatory anesthesia: the patient’s point of view2014 · 3 citations
  5. 5Patients have great expectations, but there is more to do2023