Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The objective was to review the current status of meta-analysis, the process of combining the results of similar investigations, which was described in 1976. It has evolved rapidly, and thousands have already been published. Meta-analysis may be performed in a narrative form or in the preferred statistical format, which is more rigorous and demanding. The criteria for designing and performing a meta-analysis of high quality are presented and discussed in detail, including selection criteria, quality, biases and heterogeneity, both of component studies and of results. Critical reviews of meta-analyses are presented. Examples are given from my own field--hepatology--and from my own research experience. Although meta-analysis is simple in concept, it is complex in execution. If performed with insufficient insight or attention to detail, it may give ambiguous or erroneous results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
HO Conn (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: