Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual analysis uncovers alternative theoretical foundations for inclusive education, highlighting the need for frameworks responsive to diverse and unequal global schooling contexts.
Numerous scholars have suggested that the standard knowledge base of the field of special education is not a suitable intellectual foundation for the development of research, policy, and practice in the field of inclusive education. Still, we have yet to have a dialogue on what conceptual foundations may be most generative for the growth and development of the field of inclusive education. This article imagines and initiates such a new dialogue among educational researchers and teacher educators about the intellectual resources that can best support inclusive educators everywhere. As inclusive education gets increasingly taken up within international policy discourses, it may be imperative to explore and identify theories and ideas that can be responsive to diverse and hugely unequal contexts of schooling. This article forwards an initial collection of intellectual resources for an inclusive education that can accommodate such complex schooling conditions and invites rich scholarly exchange on this issue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Danforth et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: