Key result
Complete pulmonary vein isolation resulted in a significantly higher atrial fibrillation defragmentation rate (80.0%) compared to pulmonary vein isolation with gaps (12.5%, p < 0.001) in a computational model.
Why the study?
Although pulmonary vein isolation gaps contribute to recurrence after AF catheter ablation, the underlying mechanism is unclear.
Does complete pulmonary vein isolation compared to PVI with gaps improve AF wave-dynamics and defragmentation in a computational model?
Does complete pulmonary vein isolation compared to PVI with gaps improve AF wave-dynamics and defragmentation in a computational model?
Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 12.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
In a computational model, complete PVI effectively reduced dominant frequency and increased spatial heterogeneity in extra-PV areas, offering better anti-AF effects than extra-PV DF ablation or flecainide in PVI-gap conditions.
Complete PVI enhances AF defragmentation in computational models; hypothesis-generating and requires clinical validation before practice change.
Background Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) gaps contribute to recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation, the mechanism is unclear. We used realistic computational human AF modeling to explore the AF wave-dynamic changes of PVI with gaps (PVI-gaps). Methods We included 40 patients (80% male, 61.0 ± 9.8 years old, 92.5% persistent AF) who underwent AF catheter ablation to develop our realistic computational AF model. We compared the effects of a complete PVI (CPVI) and PVI-gap (2-mm × 4) on the AF wave-dynamics by evaluating the dominant frequency (DF), spatial change of DF, maximal slope of the action potential duration restitution curve (Smax), and AF defragmentation rate (termination or change to atrial tachycardia), and tested the effects of additional virtual interventions and flecainide on ongoing AF with PVI-gaps. Results Compared with the baseline AF, CPVIs significantly reduced extra-PV DFs ( p < 0.001), but PVI-gaps did not. COV-DFs were greater after CPVIs than PVI-gaps ( p < 0.001). Neither CPVIs nor PVI-gaps changed the mean Smax. CPVIs resulted in higher AF defragmentation rates (80%) than PVI-gaps (12.5%, p < 0.001). In ongoing AF after PVI-gaps, the AF defragmentation rates after a wave-breaking gap ablation, extra-PV DF ablation, or flecainide were 60.0, 34.3, and 25.7%, respectively ( p = 0.010). Conclusion CPVIs effectively reduced the DF, increased its spatial heterogeneity in extra-PV areas, and offered better anti-AF effects than extra-PV DF ablation or additional flecainide in PVI-gap conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2022) studied Atrial fibrillation (n=40). Complete pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) vs. Pulmonary vein isolation with gaps (PVI-gap) was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation defragmentation rate (p=<0.001). Complete pulmonary vein isolation resulted in a significantly higher atrial fibrillation defragmentation rate (80.0%) compared to pulmonary vein isolation with gaps (12.5%, p < 0.001) in a computational model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: