Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study was performed to compare the performances of observers using three display formats for chest radiography. The display formats were conventional radiographs, digitized radiographs (2,048 X 2,048 X 12 bits) printed on laser film, and digitized radiographs (2,048 X 2,048 X 12 bits) displayed on a high-resolution (2,560 X 2,048 X 12-bit) gray-scale display. The test set for the study consisted of 163 cases. Sixty-four of the cases were normal, whereas the 99 remaining cases demonstrated one or more common radiographic abnormalities. Nine abnormalities were selected for analysis: costophrenic angle blunting, interstitial disease, atelectasis, pneumothorax, parenchymal mass, consolidation, obstructive disease, hilar/mediastinal mass, and apical scarring. Six experienced general radiologists participated in the evaluation. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for each abnormality and display format. The results indicate that, while the three display formats are equivalent for the detection of some abnormalities, detectable differences in observer performance may be seen even at 2,048 X 2,048 X 12 bits for the detection of obstructive disease, pneumothorax, interstitial disease, and parenchymal masses.
Cox et al. (Sat,) studied this question.