Key result
Significant functional mitral regurgitation is linked to ~150% higher post-ablation AF recurrence risk.
Why the study?
Little information was available regarding the clinical efficacy of catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF in patients with significant functional MR.
Does significant functional mitral regurgitation increase the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF?
Cohort (n=247)
No
Does significant functional mitral regurgitation increase the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF?
Hazard Ratio: 2.48 (95% CI 1.21–5.05)
Absolute Event Rate: 42.9% vs 15.1%
p-value: p=0.013
Significant functional mitral regurgitation is an independent predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence following catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF.
Significant functional MR may flag higher AF recurrence risk post-ablation; supports risk stratification but leaves open whether MR intervention improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation has been established to be an effective therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and is recommended as the treatment of choice for many patients, including those with clinically significant functional mitral regurgitation (MR). However, there is little information available about the clinical efficacy of catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF in patients with significant functional MR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 247 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent AF ablation. The study included 28 (11.3%) patients with significant functional MR and 219 (88.7%) without significant functional MR. AF recurrence was defined as the occurrence of confirmed atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting >30 seconds beyond 3 months after catheter ablation. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 20.1 ± 7.4 months (range, 3-36 months), 45 (18.2%) patients developed recurrence of AF. The recurrence rate of AF was higher in patients with significant functional MR than in those without significant functional MR (42.9% vs 15.1%; P < .001). Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that significant functional MR (hazard ratio [HR], 3.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-6.72; P < .001), age (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .009), the CHA2DS2-VASc score (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05-1.56; P = .017), and heart failure (HR, 4.71; 95% CI, 1.85-11.96; P = .001) were associated with the risk of recurrence. Multivariable analysis showed that significant functional MR (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.21-5.05; P = .013), age (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07; P = .031), and heart failure (HR, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.27-9.03; P = .015) were independent predictors of AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: Patients with significant functional MR have an increased risk of AF recurrence after catheter ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=247). Significant functional mitral regurgitation vs. Without significant functional mitral regurgitation was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence (confirmed atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting >30 seconds beyond 3 months after catheter ablation) (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.21-5.05, p=0.013). Significant functional mitral regurgitation independently increased the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation (HR 2.48).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: