Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Neuroscientific study reveals that post-choice evidence accumulation drives error detection, indicating that metacognitive judgments rely on both sensory and medial frontal inputs.
The ability to revise one's certainty or confidence in a preceding choice is a critical feature of adaptive decision-making but the neural mechanisms underpinning this metacognitive process have yet to be characterized. In the present study, we demonstrate that the same build-to-threshold decision variable signal that triggers an initial choice continues to evolve after commitment, and determines the timing and accuracy of self-initiated error detection reports by selectively representing accumulated evidence that the preceding choice was incorrect. We also show that a peri-choice signal generated in medial frontal cortex provides a source of input to this post-decision accumulation process, indicating that metacognitive judgments are not solely based on the accumulation of feedforward sensory evidence. These findings impart novel insights into the generative mechanisms of metacognition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murphy et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: