Since antiquity, artisans have created flattened forms, often called "bas-reliefs,"-which give an exaggerated perception of depth when viewed from a particular vantage point. This paper presents an explanation of this phenomena, showing that the ambiguity in determining the relief of an object is not confined to bas-relief sculpture but is implicit in the determination of the structure of any object. Formally, if the object's true surface is denoted by z/sub true/=f(x, y), then we define the "generalized bas-relief transformation" as z=/spl lambda/f(x, y)+/spl mu/x+/spl nu/y, with a corresponding transformation of the albedo. For each image of a Lambertian surface f(x, y) produced by a point light source at infinity, there exists an identical image of a bas-relief produced by a transformed light source. This equality holds for both shaded and shadowed regions. Thus, the set of possible images (illumination cone) is invariant over generalized bas-relief transformations. When /spl mu/=/spl nu/=0 (e.g. a classical bas-relief sculpture), we show that the set of possible motion fields are also identical. Thus, neither small unknown motions nor changes of illumination can resolve the bas-relief ambiguity. Implications of this ambiguity on structure recovery and shape representation are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belhumeur et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: