Key result
Among atrial fibrillation patients with an absolute indication for oral anticoagulation, only 50.6% received vitamin K antagonists, and just 14.8% of treated patients maintained therapeutic INR levels.
Why the study?
Vitamin K antagonists reduce mortality and thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation but carry a narrow therapeutic range and drug-food interactions, motivating an evaluation of their use regarding indication and adequate dosing.
Observational (n=249)
No
Real-world data demonstrates significant underuse and inadequate dosing of vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation, supporting the transition to novel oral anticoagulants.
Underuse of vitamin K antagonists persists in eligible atrial fibrillation patients; leaves open strategies to improve real-world anticoagulation delivery.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. It increases the risk of death and thromboembolic events. Vitamin K antagonists reduce these risks. Disadvantages of vitamin K antagonist therapy are narrow therapeutic range and interactions with drugs and food. In a single center prospective study, we enrolled 249 patients with atrial fibrillation over a 12-month period. The aim of our study was to evaluate vitamin K antagonist use regarding the indication and adequate dose. Data on 249 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation were collected before general availability of novel oral anticoagulants. Out of 249 patients, 160 (64.2%) had indication for oral anticoagulant therapy. Only 81 (50.6%) patients had vitamin K antagonist in therapy, 12 (14.8%) of them in adequate dose. We also analyzed 129 patients aged over 75, of which 109 (84.4%) had absolute indication for oral anticoagulant therapy. Only 34 (31.2%) patients aged over 75 had been receiving vitamin K antagonist therapy and 6 (17.6%) had the International Normalized Ratio values within the proposed therapeutic interval. We found a significantly higher rate of anticoagulant therapy introduction in patients under 75 years (p=0.03), but there were no significant differences in the adequacy of anticoagulant therapy (p=0.89) between these two populations. Our results showed clear inadequacies of vitamin K antagonist treatment with a growing need for a wider use of novel oral anticoagulants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mario Stipinović (2019) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=249). Vitamin K antagonists was evaluated on Proportion of patients with an absolute indication for oral anticoagulants receiving vitamin K antagonists. Among atrial fibrillation patients with an absolute indication for oral anticoagulation, only 50.6% received vitamin K antagonists, and just 14.8% of treated patients maintained therapeutic INR levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: