Why the study?
Does current clinical practice for thromboprophylaxis in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation align with recommendations from a decision support tool across different sexes and age groups?
Cohort (n=1,585)
Does current clinical practice for thromboprophylaxis in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation align with recommendations from a decision support tool across different sexes and age groups?
A significant proportion of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, particularly women, receive antithrombotic treatment discordant with decision support tool recommendations, often involving inappropriate use of aspirin in the elderly.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the appropriateness of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) in women and elderly adults, looking for patterns of undertreatment or unnecessary treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Primary care practices of an academic healthcare system. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (aged 28-93) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) seen between March 2013 and February 2014 (N = 1,585). MEASUREMENTS: Treatment recommendations were made using an AF decision support tool (AFDST) based on projections of quality-adjusted life expectancy calculated using a decision analytical model that integrates individual-specific risk factors for stroke and hemorrhage. RESULTS: Treatment was discordant from AFDST-recommended treatment in 45% (326/725) of women and 39% (338/860) of men (P = .02). Although current treatment was discordant from recommended in 35% (89/258) of participants aged 85 and older and in 43% (575/1,328) of those younger than 85 (P = .01), many undertreated elderly adults were receiving aspirin as the sole antithrombotic agent. CONCLUSION: Physicians should understand that female sex is a significant risk factor for AF-related stroke and incorporate this into decision-making about thromboprophylaxis. Treating older adults with aspirin instead of OAT exposes them to significant risk of bleeding with little to no reduction in AF-related stroke risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eckman et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=1,585). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Discordance between current treatment and AFDST-recommended treatment (p=.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: