Key result
Among elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, 89.9% received guideline-adherent antithrombotic therapy, and non-permanent AF was a significant predictor of NOAC use (OR 1.68).
Why the study?
Patients aged ≥75 years with atrial fibrillation are at high stroke risk and recommended for oral anticoagulation, but compliance with current guidelines and factors associated with NOAC use needed assessment.
Observational (n=1,236)
No
In a real-world cohort of elderly patients (≥75 years) with atrial fibrillation, adherence to ESC guidelines for stroke prevention was high (89.9%), with NOAC use favored in those with non-permanent AF, older age, and preserved renal function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High OAC use observed in elderly AF; reinforces guideline adherence but leaves open outcome impact in real-world cohorts.
Patients aged ≥75 years with the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) are at a higher risk of stroke and, according to recent recommendations, should receive oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. This study aimed to assess the recommended prophylactic antithrombotic therapy among patients with AF aged ≥ 75 years and its compliance with current guidelines. We also aimed to identify predisposing factors associated with the administration of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in elderly patients with AF.This was a retrospective, single-center observational study. Patients with AF aged ≥75 years hospitalized at a reference cardiology center from 2014 to 2017 were included in the analysis.Among the 1236 eligible patients (43.4% male; mean age, 82 years), OACs were recommended in 90.1% of cases. Of these, 59.8% of patients used NOACs and 40.2% used vitamin K antagonists. Additionally, 3.3% of patients received antiplatelet (AP) therapy and 2.5% were administered low molecular weight heparin. Only 4.5% of patients did not receive any anticoagulant treatment. The majority (89.9%) of patients received relevant prophylactic antithrombotic therapy according to current guidelines; only 1.4% were overtreated and 8.7% were undertreated. The significant predictors of NOAC therapy among patients treated with anticoagulants were non-permanent AF (odds ratio [OR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30-2.18, P = .0001), age-by 5 years (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.16-1.52, P = .0001), and glomerular filtration rate-by 5 units (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02-1.10, P = .0066).A high percentage of AF patients aged ≥75 years receive OACs, mainly NOACs. Most patients are treated according to the current guidelines; under treatment is primarily observed in patients receiving AP therapy. Non-permanent AF, age, and preservation of renal function are significant predictors of NOAC use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gorczyca−Michta et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,236). Non-permanent atrial fibrillation vs. Permanent atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Prescription of NOACs (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.30-2.18, p=0.0001). Among elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, 89.9% received guideline-adherent antithrombotic therapy, and non-permanent AF was a significant predictor of NOAC use (OR 1.68).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: