Key result
Guideline-directed AF management substantially reduces clinical events and overall healthcare costs.
Why the study?
Does optimal management of atrial fibrillation reduce costs and clinical consequences compared to suboptimal management in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does optimal management of atrial fibrillation reduce costs and clinical consequences compared to suboptimal management in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suboptimal management of atrial fibrillation imposes a substantial economic and clinical burden, highlighting the need for guideline adherence and optimal use of antithrombotic and antiarrhythmic therapies.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) places a considerable burden on the US health care system, society, and individual patients due to its associated morbidity, mortality, and reduced health-related quality of life. AF increases the risk of stroke, which often results in lengthy hospital stays, increased disability, and long-term care, all of which impact medical costs. An expected increase in the prevalence of AF and incidence of AF-related stroke underscores the need for optimal management of this disorder. Although AF treatment strategies have been proven effective in clinical trials, data show that patients still receive suboptimal treatment. Adherence to AF treatment guidelines will help to optimize treatment and reduce costs due to AF-associated events; new treatments for AF show promise for future reductions in disease and cost burden due to improved tolerability profiles. Additional research is necessary to compare treatment costs and outcomes of new versus existing agents; an immediate effort to optimize treatment based on existing evidence and guidelines is critical to reducing the burden of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steven Singh (2012) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Optimal atrial fibrillation management vs. Suboptimal management was evaluated. Suboptimal management of atrial fibrillation leads to substantial clinical and economic burdens, while adherence to guidelines and newer treatments can optimize care and reduce costs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: