Key result
AI applied to ECGs detects LVEF <40% with ~0.95 AUC, outperforming major ECG alterations.
Why the study?
Heart failure causes important morbidity and mortality, prompting evaluation of whether an artificial intelligence algorithm applied to low-cost, widely available ECGs can detect it compared to major electrocardiographic alterations.
Does an artificial intelligence algorithm applied to ECG improve the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF <40%) compared to major electrocardiographic alterations in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,567)
Yes
Does an artificial intelligence algorithm applied to ECG improve the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF <40%) compared to major electrocardiographic alterations in adults?
Effect estimate: AUC-ROC 0.947 (95% CI 0.913-0.981)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.69% vs 0.172%
An AI algorithm applied to standard 12-lead ECGs accurately detects left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF <40%) and significantly outperforms traditional major electrocardiographic alterations, suggesting its utility as a low-cost screening tool.
Background Heart failure (HF) is a disease associated with an important type of morbidity and mortality. The electrocardiogram (ECG), one of the tests used to evaluate HF, is low-cost and widely available. Objective To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm applied to ECG to detect HF and compare it with the predictive power of major electrocardiographic alterations (MEA). Methods This work is a diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study. All participants were from the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (Estudo Longitudinal da Saúde do Adulto - ELSA-Brasil) and presented a valid ECG and echocardiogram (ECHO). The algorithm estimated probability values for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). The assessed endpoint was left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% in the ECHO. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were determined for both the algorithm and the MEA. The area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for the algorithm was calculated. Results In the analytical sample of 2,567 individuals, the prevalence of LVEF <40% was 1.13% (29 individuals). The values obtained for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR+, LR-, and DOR for the algorithm were 0.690, 0.976, 0.244, 0.996, 27.6, 0.32, and 88.74, respectively. For the MEA, the values were 0.172, 0.837, 0.012, 0.989, 1.09, 0.990, and 1.07, respectively. The AUC-ROC of the algorithm to predict the LVEF <40% was 0.947 (95% CI: 0.913 – 0.981). Conclusion The AI algorithm performed well in detecting LVSD and can be used as a screening tool for LVSD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Júnior et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (n=2,567). Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm applied to ECG vs. Major electrocardiographic alterations (MEA) was evaluated on Detection of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% (AUC-ROC 0.947, 95% CI 0.913-0.981). An artificial intelligence algorithm applied to electrocardiograms accurately detected left ventricular ejection fraction <40% with an AUC-ROC of 0.947, outperforming major electrocardiographic alterations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: