Key result
Isometric contractions are required to estimate cardiac activation heat because shortening muscle liberates additional heat.
Why the study?
Two non-pharmacological approaches to quantify cardiac activation energy yield inconsistent results regarding whether the estimate depends on the mode of contraction.
The study demonstrates that estimating cardiac activation energy using the pressure-volume area concept during shortening contractions is inaccurate due to the heat of shortening, recommending isometric contractions instead.
Cardiac activation heat estimates require isometric conditions in muscle studies; leaves open translation to shortening in vivo or clinical settings.
In the excitation of muscle contraction, calcium ions interact with transmembrane transporters. This process is accompanied by energy consumption and heat liberation. To quantify this activation energy or heat in the heart or cardiac muscle, two non-pharmacological approaches can be used. In one approach using the "pressure-volume area" concept, the same estimate of activation energy is obtained regardless of the mode of contraction (either isovolumic/isometric or ejecting/shortening). In the other approach, an accurate estimate of activation energy is obtained only when the muscle contracts isometrically. If the contraction involves muscle shortening, then an additional component of heat associated with shortening is liberated, over and above that of activation. The present study thus examines the reconcilability of the two approaches by performing experiments on isolated muscles measuring contractile force and heat output. A framework was devised from the experimental data to allow us to replicate several mechanoenergetics results gleaned from the literature. From these replications, we conclude that the choice of initial muscle length (or ventricular volume) underlies the divergence of the two approaches in the estimation of activation energy when the mode of contraction involves shortening (ejection). At low initial muscle lengths, the heat of shortening is relatively small, which can lead to the misconception that activation energy is contraction mode independent. In fact, because cardiac muscle liberates heat of shortening when allowed to shorten, estimation of activation heat must be performed only under isometric (isovolumic) contractions. We thus recommend caution when estimating activation energy using the "pressure-volume area" concept.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2023) studied Cardiac muscle contraction (n=10). Isometric vs work-loop contractions was evaluated on Activation heat/energy estimation. Estimation of cardiac activation heat must be performed only under isometric contractions because cardiac muscle liberates heat of shortening when allowed to shorten.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: