Key result
Women veterans at high risk for cardiovascular disease were significantly less satisfied with their cholesterol levels compared to men (adjusted mean score 4.3 vs 5.6, p<0.01).
Why the study?
Does gender affect satisfaction with lipid control and confidence in ability to improve it among veterans at high risk for cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=428)
No
Does gender affect satisfaction with lipid control and confidence in ability to improve it among veterans at high risk for cardiovascular disease?
Women veterans at high risk for cardiovascular disease are less satisfied with their lipid control than men, highlighting the need to address social support and patient-centered factors to reduce gender disparities in hyperlipidemia management.
Lower satisfaction with lipid control among women veterans signals possible care gaps; hypothesis-generating for gender-specific interventions pending prospective data.
BACKGROUND: Compared with men, women have poorer lipid control. Although potential causes of this disparity have been explored, it is unknown whether patient-centered factors such as satisfaction and confidence contribute. We evaluated (1) whether satisfaction with lipid control and confidence in ability to improve it vary by gender and (2) whether sociodemographic characteristics modify the association. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated baseline survey responses from the Cardiovascular Intervention Improvement Telemedicine Study, including self-rated satisfaction with cholesterol levels and confidence in controlling cholesterol. Participants had poorly controlled hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia. RESULTS: A total of 428 veterans (15% women) participated. Compared with men, women had higher low-density lipoprotein values at 141.2 versus 121.7 mg/dL, respectively (p < 0.05), higher health literacy, and were less likely to have someone to help track their medications (all p < 0.05). In an adjusted model, women were less satisfied with their cholesterol levels than men with estimated mean scores of 4.3 versus 5.6 on a 1-10 Likert scale (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in confidence by gender. Participants with support for tracking medications reported higher confidence levels than those without, estimated mean 7.8 versus 7.2 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Women veterans at high risk for cardiovascular disease were less satisfied with their lipid control than men; however, confidence in ability to improve lipid levels was similar. Veterans without someone to help to track medications were less confident, and women were less likely to have this type of social support. Lack of social support for medication tracking may be a factor in lingering gender-based disparities in hyperlipidemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldstein et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Poorly controlled hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia (n=428). Female gender vs. Male gender was evaluated on Self-rated satisfaction with cholesterol levels (1-10 scale, adjusted model) (p=<0.01). Women veterans at high risk for cardiovascular disease were significantly less satisfied with their cholesterol levels compared to men (adjusted mean score 4.3 vs 5.6, p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: