Robotic modeling and experimental validation demonstrates position offsets dictate energy efficiency between series and parallel elastic actuators, highlighting task-specific design criteria.
It is well-established that properly tuned elastic elements can make robotic actuators more energy-efficient, especially in cyclic tasks. Considering a drive train topology, two important subcategories of elastic actuators are series elastic actuation (SEA) and parallel elastic actuation (PEA). There is still no definite answer to the fundamental question which topology consumes less energy in a given task. This paper approaches the problem by studying oscillatory motions of a single degree-of-freedom link in a gravitational field. The imposed motion is a sinusoid with a nonzero offset requiring a static torque that needs to be compensated by the actuation system. Simulations and experiments show that the SEA consumes less energy up to certain offset angles. At high offsets, the PEA becomes the more energy-efficient alternative, provided that its no-load angle is properly tuned. Inverse dynamics simulations show how a threshold offset angle can be determined for a given task.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beckerle et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: