Key result
Review outlines established and emerging pharmacotherapies across all five WHO pulmonary hypertension groups.
Why the study?
There is a continued need to develop new therapies for all types of PH, as most current treatments improve functional capacity and symptoms without a significant mortality benefit.
This review provides an update on established and emerging pharmacological treatments across all five WHO groups of pulmonary hypertension.
May guide PH management across WHO groups; leaves open validation of emerging options in prospective trials.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is defined as elevated pressures in the pulmonary artery and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The World Health Organization classifies PH into 5 distinct groups based on underlying etiology, pathology, and modality of treatment. Therapeutic approach may be challenging due to the extensive spectrum of causes and underlying mechanisms mediating PH. The 5 groups include pulmonary arterial hypertension (group 1), PH secondary to left heart disease (group 2), PH secondary to chronic lung disease (group 3), chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (group 4), and PH due to miscellaneous causes (group 5). Although significant progress has been made in the treatment of group 1 PH, there is a continued need to develop new therapies for all types of PH. Additionally, most treatments currently available improve functional capacity and symptoms but without a significant benefit in mortality. In this review, we aim to describe the various etiologies of PH and their established pharmacotherapies, as well as expand on emerging therapeutic options for each group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2024) conducted a review in Pulmonary hypertension. Pharmacotherapies and emerging treatments was evaluated. This review describes the various etiologies of pulmonary hypertension, their established pharmacotherapies, and emerging therapeutic options for each of the five WHO groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: