Involving patients in the co-design and co-development of heart failure transitional-care programs can help address the unique concerns and obstacles they face during the post-hospital discharge period.
Integrating patient perspectives and co-design into heart failure transitional care programs is essential for improving self-management and outcomes post-discharge.
BACKGROUND: People living with heart failure (HF) are particularly vulnerable after hospital discharge. An alliance between patient authors, clinicians, industry, and co-developers of HF programs can represent an effective way to address the unique concerns and obstacles people living with HF face during this period. The aim of this narrative review article is to discuss challenges and opportunities of this approach, with the goal of improving participation and clinical outcomes of people living with HF. METHODS: This article was co-authored by people living with HF, heart transplant recipients, patient advocacy representatives, cardiologists with expertise in HF care, and industry representatives specializing in patient engagement and cardiovascular medicine, and reviews opportunities and challenges for people living with HF in the post-hospital discharge period to be more integrally involved in their care. A literature search was conducted, and the authors collaborated through two virtual roundtables and via email to develop the content for this review article. RESULTS: Numerous transitional-care programs exist to ease the transition from the hospital to the home and to provide needed education and support for people living with HF, to avoid rehospitalizations and other adverse outcomes. However, many programs have limitations and do not integrally involve patients in the design and co-development of the intervention. There are thus opportunities for improvement. This can enable patients to better care for themselves with less of the worry and fear that typically accompany the transition from the hospital. We discuss the importance of including people living with HF in the development of such programs and offer suggestions for strategies that can help achieve these goals. An underlying theme of the literature reviewed is that education and engagement of people living with HF after hospitalization are critical. However, while clinical trial evidence on existing approaches to transitions in HF care indicates numerous benefits, such approaches also have limitations. CONCLUSION: Numerous challenges continue to affect people living with HF in the post-hospital discharge period. Strategies that involve patients are needed, and should be encouraged, to optimally address these challenges.
Butler et al. (Thu,) conducted a review in Heart failure. Patient involvement in self-care programs was evaluated. Involving patients in the co-design and co-development of heart failure transitional-care programs can help address the unique concerns and obstacles they face during the post-hospital discharge period.