Key result
A 10-second 12-lead ECG accurately estimated 5-minute ECG Heart Age (R2=0.94), with the Heart Age Gap increasing significantly in patients with cardiovascular risk and established disease.
Why the study?
Electrocardiographic Heart Age conveys cardiovascular risk, but whether explainable measures from a standard 10-second 12-lead ECG could predict Bayesian 5-minute ECG Heart Age was unknown.
Can explainable measures from a standard 10-second 12-lead ECG accurately predict Bayesian 5-minute ECG Heart Age and estimate cardiovascular risk?
Observational (n=2,771)
Yes
Can explainable measures from a standard 10-second 12-lead ECG accurately predict Bayesian 5-minute ECG Heart Age and estimate cardiovascular risk?
Heart Age can be accurately estimated from a standard 10-second 12-lead ECG using transparent, explainable measures, providing a practical tool for cardiovascular risk communication.
Background Electrocardiographic (ECG) Heart Age conveying cardiovascular risk has been estimated by both Bayesian and artificial intelligence approaches. We hypothesised that explainable measures from the 10-second 12-lead ECG could successfully predict Bayesian 5-min ECG Heart Age. Methods Advanced analysis was performed on ECGs from healthy subjects and patients with cardiovascular risk or proven heart disease. Regression models were used to predict patients’ Bayesian 5-minute ECG Heart Ages from their standard, resting 10-second 12-lead ECGs. The difference between 5-min and 10-second ECG Heart Ages were analyzed, as were the differences between 10-second ECG Heart Age and the chronological age (the Heart Age Gap). Results In total, 2,771 subjects were included (n=1682 healthy volunteers, n=305 with cardiovascular risk factors, n=784 with cardiovascular disease). Overall, 10-second Heart Age showed strong agreement with the 5-minute Heart Age (R 2 =0.94, p<0.001, mean±SD bias 0.0±5.1 years). The Heart Age Gap was 0.0±5.7 years in healthy individuals, 7.4±7.3 years in subjects with cardiovascular risk factors (p<0.001), and 14.3±9.2 years in patients with cardiovascular disease (p<0.001). Conclusions Heart Age can be accurately estimated from a 10-second 12-lead ECG in a transparent and explainable fashion based on known ECG measures, without artificial intelligence techniques. The Heart Age Gap increases markedly with cardiovascular risk and disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindow et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular risk and disease (n=2,771). 10-second 12-lead ECG Heart Age estimation vs. 5-minute ECG Heart Age and chronological age was evaluated on Agreement between 10-second Heart Age and 5-minute Heart Age (R2 0.94, p=<0.001). A 10-second 12-lead ECG accurately estimated 5-minute ECG Heart Age (R2=0.94), with the Heart Age Gap increasing significantly in patients with cardiovascular risk and established disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: