Key result
Multi-task transformer estimates ECG age within ~10 years and moderately predicts future cardiovascular risk.
Why the study?
The ability of ECG-derived biological age models to generalise across hospitals and incorporate complementary clinical context such as EHR remains unclear.
Can a multi-task convolutional transformer model using 12-lead ECGs and temporal ICD histories accurately estimate biological age and predict cardiovascular risk across different hospital systems?
Observational (n=998,844)
Yes
Can a multi-task convolutional transformer model using 12-lead ECGs and temporal ICD histories accurately estimate biological age and predict cardiovascular risk across different hospital systems?
An ECG-derived biological age and risk prediction model trained on one hospital system generalized to an unseen cohort of nearly 1 million patients, demonstrating potential as a digital biomarker for cardiovascular screening.
ECG-derived biological age models need multi-hospital validation before use; leaves open whether EHR integration meaningfully improves risk stratification.
Biological age reflects the functional state of the heart and can differ from chronological age, providing a useful indicator of cardiovascular health. This difference, estimated from electrocardiogram (ECG) signals as ECGderived biological age, has emerged as a promising digital biomarker for cardiovascular risk stratification. However, the ability of such models to generalise across hospitals and to leverage complementary clinical context such as electronic health records (EHR) remains unclear. This work presents a multi-task convolutional transformer that jointly estimates ECG-age, predicts ICD-coded risk for myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and heart failure (HF), and computes a mortality hazard score from 12-lead ECG signals combined with temporal ICD histories, an aspect largely unexplored in prior ECG-derived biological age. The model is trained exclusively on Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) data from the Harvard-Emory ECG Database and evaluated on the complete Emory University Hospital (EUH) cohort (n = 998,844) without any domain adaptation. On this unseen cohort, the model achieves an age prediction mean absolute error of 9.97 years (Pearson r = 0.64), with AUROCs of 0.675 (MI), 0.676 (HF), 0.656 (stroke), and 0.580 (mortality C-index = 0.582). Saliency analysis highlights QRS-complex and T-wave regions, consistent with known cardiac ageing patterns. Subgroup analysis shows broadly equitable performance across race and age groups (AUROC range 0.505-0.721). A clinical reasoning module translates model outputs into structured risk narratives for patient-level interpretation. These findings position ECG-derived age and risk prediction as a generalisable digital biomarker for large-scale cardiovascular screening and early risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chary et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular risk (n=998,844). ECG-derived biological age and risk prediction model was evaluated on Age prediction mean absolute error and AUROCs for MI, HF, stroke, and mortality. A multi-task convolutional transformer estimated ECG-derived biological age with a mean absolute error of 9.97 years and predicted risk for MI, HF, and stroke with AUROCs of 0.675, 0.676, and 0.656.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: