Key result
AI-ECG clock acceleration is linked to ~26% higher risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure.
Why the study?
Deep learning can estimate age from 12-lead ECGs, but whether the discrepancy between AI-predicted and chronological age reflects meaningful electrophysiological, structural, and molecular signatures of cardiovascular aging remained uncertain.
Does AI-derived ECG clock acceleration predict electrophysiological and structural cardiovascular outcomes in large clinical cohorts?
Cohort (n=1,307,000)
Yes
Does AI-derived ECG clock acceleration predict electrophysiological and structural cardiovascular outcomes in large clinical cohorts?
An AI-derived 12-lead ECG clock acceleration metric reliably captures cardiovascular and electrophysiological ageing phenotypes, predicting clinical arrhythmias, heart failure, and structural heart disease with supporting multi-omic and genetic correlates.
ECG clock acceleration was associated with graded arrhythmia risk; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background Deep learning can estimate age from 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs)(1), but whether the discrepancy between predicted and chronological age reflects meaningful cardiovascular aging remains uncertain. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-derived ECG clock and tested whether this "clock acceleration" (AI-predicted minus chronological age) captures electrophysiological, structural, and molecular signatures of cardiovascular aging. Methods The ECG clock was derived from a one-dimensional residual neural network (1D-ResNet) trained on 1.2 million 12-lead ECGs from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC). Prognostic associations were tested using age- and sex-adjusted Cox models in BIDMC (n=62K), the Airwave Health Monitoring Study (AHMS; n=45K), and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH; n=1.2M). Contemporaneous echocardiographic, metabolomic, lipoprotein and proteomic correlates were evaluated in the multi-omic subset of AHMS. Genetic validation used Mendelian randomisation across ten cardiovascular outcomes, with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Results Model performance was robust across cohorts (MAE: 7.48 years in BIDMC, 6.44 in AHMS, and 8.16 in MGH). Higher ECG clock acceleration showed graded risk increases, strongest for electrophysiological outcomes: atrial flutter (hazard ratio [HR] range across cohorts: 1.26–1.62), atrial fibrillation (1.26–1.37), bundle branch block (1.23–1.79), complete heart block (1.29–2.07), and sudden cardiac death (1.09–1.34). Structural associations were also consistent: dilated-cardiomyopathy (1.22–1.84), heart failure (1.24–1.37), and aortic aneurysm (1.21–1.35). Accelerated ECG age correlated with atrial enlargement, conduction prolongation, and reduced ejection fraction on echocardiography. Plasma metabolomics analysis revealed association of heart age acceleration with increased levels of circulatory fatty acids, pro-inflammatory lipids, acylcarnitines, purine metabolism and ethanolamides. In opposition we found higher levels of antioxidants (dietary, ether/plasmalogen phospholipids), steroid metabolites, branched-chain aminoacids and N-acyl ethanolamides, as well as large HDL particles. Phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism pathway, urea cycle and arginine metabolism presented both pro- and anti- ageing metabolites. Proteomics analysis also revealed an inflammatory pattern (chemokines, IL-1 signalling). Mendelian randomisation showed strongest genetic support for atrial fibrillation, with multiple FDR-significant loci; heart failure and cardiomyopathy signals were more modest, and vascular associations were weaker. Conclusion The AI-ECG clock captures a scalable cardiovascular and electrophysiological ageing phenotype with linked structural, molecular and genetic correlates. Classifying individuals with accelerated versus decelerated ECG ageing improves interpretability and supports use in risk stratification, trial enrichment, and therapeutic target discovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barker et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular aging (n=1,307,000). AI-ECG clock acceleration (AI-predicted minus chronological age) vs. Decelerated or chronological ECG age was evaluated on Electrophysiological and structural cardiovascular outcomes (including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, heart block, sudden cardiac death, and heart failure) (HR 1.26-1.37 (atrial fibrillation); HR 1.24-1.37 (heart failure)). Higher AI-ECG clock acceleration was associated with graded increases in risk for atrial fibrillation (HR range 1.26–1.37), complete heart block (HR 1.29–2.07), and heart failure (HR 1.24–1.37).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: