Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, we study the efficacy of error control schemes for energy-efficient reliable delivery of large files (hundreds of GBs) over core optical networks. Specifically, we examine two schemes: automatic repeat request (ARQ), and hybrid ARQ (i.e. ARQ combined with forward error correction (FEC) capability). We focus on Reed-Solomon (RS) FEC codes (in hybrid ARQ) and propose a new model, incorporating different block sizes as well as code error-correction capability, to estimate the energy consumption for performing encoding and decoding operations in optical networks. The model considers the impact of varying pre-FEC bit-error rates (BER) of the optical channel, and the signal processing blocks used to implement RS codes. Our results show that when the pre-FEC channel BER is in excess of 10 -5 , hybrid ARQ offers better performance than ARQ in terms of energy efficiency. However, both hybrid ARQ and ARQ have similar performance under lower BER.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: