Key result
Bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin during temporary warfarin interruption resulted in a 3.6% rate of thromboembolism and a 6.7% rate of major bleeding at 3 months.
Why the study?
Does bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin safely prevent thromboembolism in patients at high risk of arterial embolism requiring temporary interruption of warfarin?
Cohort (n=224)
Yes
Does bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin safely prevent thromboembolism in patients at high risk of arterial embolism requiring temporary interruption of warfarin?
Bridging therapy with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin is feasible during temporary interruption of warfarin, but carries risks of major bleeding and thromboembolism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bridging carries notable risks in high-risk patients; leaves open optimal periprocedural strategies pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: When warfarin is interrupted for surgery, low-molecular-weight heparin is often used as bridging therapy. However, this practice has never been evaluated in a large prospective study. This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin initiated out of hospital. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm cohort study of patients at high risk of arterial embolism (prosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation with a major risk factor). Warfarin was held for 5 days preoperatively. Low-molecular-weight heparin was given 3 days preoperatively and at least 4 days postoperatively. Patients were followed up for 3 months for thromboembolism and bleeding. Eleven Canadian tertiary care academic centers participated; 224 patients were enrolled. Eight patients (3.6%; 95% CI, 1.8 to 6.9) had an episode of thromboembolism, of which 2 (0.9%; 95% CI, 0.2 to 3.2) were judged to be due to cardioembolism. Of these 8 episodes of thromboembolism, 6 occurred in patients who had warfarin deferred or withdrawn because of bleeding. There were 15 episodes of major bleeding (6.7%; 95% CI, 4.1 to 10.8): 8 occurred intraoperatively or early postoperatively before low-molecular-weight heparin was restarted, 5 occurred in the first postoperative week after low-molecular-weight heparin was restarted, and 2 occurred well after low-molecular-weight heparin was stopped. There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Bridging therapy with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin is feasible; however, the optimal approach for the management of patients who require temporary interruption of warfarin to have invasive procedures is uncertain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kovacs et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in High risk of arterial embolism requiring temporary interruption of warfarin (n=224). Low-molecular-weight heparin was evaluated on Thromboembolism (95% CI 1.8 to 6.9). Bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin during temporary warfarin interruption resulted in a 3.6% rate of thromboembolism and a 6.7% rate of major bleeding at 3 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: