Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper compares the power efficiency of multiple 2D, 2.5D and 3D interconnect scenarios, specifically DDR3 with PCB, DDR3 with interposers, LPDDR2(3) with POP, wide I/Os with through-silicon vias (TSVs) and interposers and 32 nm technology CMOS drivers with TSVs and on-chip wires. It was found that DDR3 with PCB is the lowest power efficiency (15.65 mW/Gbps) and custom designed CMOS drivers optimized for the 2.5D and 3D give the highest power efficiency (0.23mW/Gbps). Optimization of a Back End of the Line (BEOL) 65 nm interposer interface is also presented for Wide IO interface to find maximize power efficiency. Power efficiency for different interposer trace lengths (5mm-40mm) and pitches (4.6μm-11.05μm) was analyzed. It was found that power efficiency decreases linearly with the increase of pitch and length of the interposer traces both in one stack and 4 stack die of Wide IO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karim et al. (2013) studied this question.