Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reference transmissivities based on line-by-line calculations have been computed for a wide range of homogeneous paths of water vapor. A new approach is employed in which wideband emissivities are directly fitted to the line-by-line reference calculations without using the intermediate step of narrowband models. A significant improvement in accuracy is obtained over previous schemes. Compared with line-by-line computed fluxes and cooling rates (without continuum absorption) for the standard middle-latitude summer (MLS) profile, the maximum error in fluxes is 1.5 W m−2 agreement is within 1% in fluxes and within 0.11 K/day, or 5%. in cooling rate. Unlike most published water vapor continuum schemes, which use the Roberts et al. model, the authors have reformulated the treatment of the water vapor continuum by producing a new parameterization based on the semiempirical model of Cough et al. This results in ∼7.5 W m−2 difference in calculated radiative fluxes at the tropopause, and maximum difference in fluxes can approach 15 W m−2 in the troposphere for the MLS atmosphere.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: