PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2016New Technology Work and Employment99 citationsOpen Access

When should workers embrace or resist new technology?

View Full Paper
PEPaul EdwardsPRPaulina Ramírez

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The question of how workers might respond to new technologies has lurked behind many debates on the subject. It has not been posed directly, in part because of concerns about the determinism of asking about the effects of a technology. A preliminary is to set aside these concerns by showing that effects can be identified without determinism. The main argument is that technologies can be assessed on six dimensions: intended or unintended effects; direct and indirect effects; degree of reconstitution in use; immanence; degree of success and degree of discontinuity with the past. These dimensions can then be used to pose questions about any one technology. Three illustrations suggest how such questions can be posed in concrete conditions. Technologies can be challenged so that alternatives to extant systems of work organisation can be considered.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Edwards et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c35fb27b545b111a99c5fhttps://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12067
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Learning from Saturn2003 · 34 citations
  2. 2The implementation of the Telework and Work-related Stress Agreements: European social dialogue through ‘soft’ law?2011 · 22 citations
  3. 3Time-and-motion regained1993 · 234 citations
  4. 4Theses on the Theory of the State1982 · 139 citations
  5. 5The politics of global production: A pple, F oxconn and C hina's new working class2013 · 232 citations