Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan initiation significantly reduced the rate of patients experiencing heart failure episodes from 25.4% (antecedent) to 11.4% (incident) over a mean of 221 days (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce heart failure admissions in a real-world cohort of heart failure patients?
Observational (n=201)
No
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce heart failure admissions in a real-world cohort of heart failure patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 11.4% vs 25.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduces heart failure hospitalizations in a real-world, older, and frailer heart failure population.
Supports fewer HF episodes in real-world older patients; extends mixed evidence but remains hypothesis-generating.
BACKGROUND: Sacubitril/valsartan reduced heart failure (HF)-admissions and cardiovascular mortality in the PARADIGM-HF-trial. However, real-world patients are often frailer and less able to tolerate high doses of sacubitril/valsartan. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients prescribed sacubitril/valsartan in a single tertiary HF-clinic between December 2016 and January 2018. HF-admissions were assessed in a paired fashion, comparing the amount of antecedent HF-episodes with incident HF-episodes after the initiation. Baseline risk for adverse events was assessed by the EMPHASIS-HF-risk-score. RESULTS: A total of 201-HF-patients were retrospectively identified (age = 68 ± 11 years, ejection fraction = 29 ± 8%). Real world patients were older, had higher serum creatinine and a higher New-York Heart-Association (NYHA)-class (p < .05 for all) than in the PARADIGM-HF trial. Over a mean duration of 221 ± 114 days after initiation of sacubitril/valsartan a total of 23-individual patients experienced at least one HF-episodes. Over the same time period preceding initiation of sacubitril/valsartan, 51 individual patients experienced a HF-episodes (p < .001). Sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced the rate of incident vs. antecedent HF-admissions, in patients with low or high baseline NYHA-class (II vs. III and IV; p value = 0.019 respectively p = .004) or patients with an EMPHASIS-HF risk score below or above the mean (p = .002 respectively p = .016). Patients older than 75-years exhibited a trend towards HF-reduction. Higher doses of sacubitril/valsartan were associated with more reduction in incident versus antecedent HF-episodes. CONCLUSION: Despite being frailer and older, real-world patients exhibit a significant and early reduction in incident HF-hospitalisations following initiation of sacubitril/valsartan. Higher doses might be associated with more reduction in HF-admissions, underscoring the importance of dose uptitration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martens et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=201). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Antecedent period (before initiation) was evaluated on Heart failure admissions/episodes (p=<0.001). Sacubitril/valsartan initiation significantly reduced the rate of patients experiencing heart failure episodes from 25.4% (antecedent) to 11.4% (incident) over a mean of 221 days (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: