Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 1-methylnicotinamide (MNA) has been considered to be an inactive metabolite of nicotinamide. Here we assessed the anti-thrombotic activity of MNA in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Antithrombotic action of MNA was studied in normotensive rats with extracorporeal thrombus formation (thrombolysis), in renovascular hypertensive rats with intraarterial thrombus formation (arterial thrombosis) and in a venous thrombosis model in rats (venous thrombosis). KEY RESULTS: MNA (3-100 mg kg(-1)) induced a dose-dependent and sustained thrombolytic response, associated with a rise in 6-keto-PGF(1alpha) in blood. Various compounds structurally related to MNA were either inactive or weaker thrombolytics. Rofecoxib (0.01-1 mg kg(-1)), dose-dependently inhibited the thrombolytic response of MNA, indomethacin (5 mg kg(-1)) abolished it, while L-NAME (5 mg kg(-1)) were without effect. MNA (3-30 mg kg(-1)) also reduced arterial thrombosis and this effect was abrogated by indomethacin (2.5 mg kg(-1)) as well as by rofecoxib (1 mg kg(-1)). MNA, however, did not affect venous thrombosis. In vitro MNA did not modify platelet aggregation nor induce vasodilation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: MNA displayed a profile of anti-thrombotic activity in vivo that surpasses that of closely related compounds. MNA inhibited platelet-dependent thrombosis by a mechanism involving cyclooxygenase-2 and prostacyclin. Our findings suggest that endogenous MNA, produced in the liver by nicotinamide N-methyltransferase, could be an endogenous activator of prostacyclin production and thus may regulate thrombotic as well as inflammatory processes in the cardiovascular system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chłopicki et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: