Why the study?
There is a gap in understanding factors that support sustained use of digital health tools for patients with AF.
What factors predict the sustained use of a smartphone-based ECG monitor in patients with atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=105)
Open-label
Randomized to usual cardiac care or daily AliveCor use and text messages
No
What factors predict the sustained use of a smartphone-based ECG monitor in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Frequent use of digital health ECG monitoring in AF patients is driven by symptomatic cardiac events like premature atrial contractions, highlighting the need to incorporate symptom burden in future digital health trials.
PACs may drive frequent smartphone ECG use in AF; hypothesis-generating for symptom-informed adherence in future digital trials.
AIMS: Digital health can transform the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) and enable patients to take a central role in detecting symptoms and self-managing AF. There is a gap in understanding factors that support sustained use of digital health tools for patients with AF. This study identified predictors of Alivecor® KardiaMobile ECG monitor usage among patients with AF enrolled in the iPhone®Helping Evaluate Atrial fibrillation Rhythm through Technology (iHEART) randomized controlled trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data from 105 English and Spanish-speaking adults with AF enrolled in the intervention arm of the iHEART trial. The iHEART intervention included smartphone-based electrocardiogram self-monitoring with Alivecor® KardiaMobile and triweekly text messages for 6 months. The primary outcome was use of Alivecor® categorized as: infrequent (≤5 times/week), moderate (>5 times and ≤11 times/week), and frequent (>11 times/week). We applied multinomial logistic regression modelling to characterize frequency and predictors of use. Of the 105 participants, 25% were female, 75% were White, and 45% were ≥65 years of age. Premature atrial contractions (PACs) [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.23, 1.08-1.40, P = 0.002] predicted frequent as compared to infrequent use. PACs (adjusted OR: 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.30, P = 0.003), lower symptom burden (adjusted OR: 1.06, 1.01-1.11, P = 0.02), and less treatment concern (adjusted OR: 0.96, 0.93-0.99, P = 0.02) predicted moderate as compared to infrequent use. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent use of AliveCor® is associated with AF symptoms and potentially symptomatic cardiac events. Symptom burden and frequency should be measured and incorporated into analyses of future digital health trials for AF management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Creber et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=105). Alivecor KardiaMobile ECG monitor vs. Usual cardiac care was evaluated on Frequent (>11 times/week) vs infrequent (≤5 times/week) use of AliveCor (predicted by premature atrial contractions) (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.40, p=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: