Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The relationship between activation-dependent changes in beta1 integrin conformation, T cell adhesion to immobilized fibronectin, and T cell migration in vitro was analyzed in this study. Stimulation of Jurkat T cells and peripheral T cells with Mn(2+), the activating beta1 integrin-specific monoclonal antibody (mAb) TS2 /16, CD2, or CD28 stimulation led to increased adhesion, soluble fibronectin (FN) binding and expression of the activation epitope defined by the beta1 integrin mAb HUTS-21. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate treatment increased adhesion, but not soluble FN binding or HUTS-21 epitope expression. In peripheral T cells, CD3 or CD7 stimulation also led to increased adhesion, soluble FN binding and HUTS-21 epitope expression. Soluble FN blocked peripheral T cell adhesion induced by Mn(2+) or TS2/16, but had no effect on adhesion induced by the other integrin-activating signals. In contrast, migration induced by TS2/16, CD2, CD3, CD7 or CD28 stimulation was blocked by excess soluble FN. Phosphoinositide 3-OH kinase (PI 3-K) inhibitors blocked receptor-mediated increases in cell adhesion, but not soluble FN binding or HUTS-21 expression. Migration was similarly unaffected by PI 3-K inhibitors, with the exception of CD7- and CD28-induced migration, which was specifically blocked by LY294,002. These results suggest that activation-dependent changes in beta1 integrin conformation are PI 3-K-independent and are involved in T cell migration but not adhesion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woods et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: