Key result
Intra-individual variation of cardiac troponin I did not significantly differ by sex, age, season, or time between samples, with >90% of subjects having a reference change value <9 ng/L.
Why the study?
Studies assessing the intra-individual biological variation (CVi) of cardiac troponin (cTnI) had been limited in examining whether CVi changes across different settings.
Observational (n=444)
Cardiac troponin I concentrations show very little intra-individual variation in patients without acute myocardial infarction, making delta changes highly valuable for ED assessment even below the 99th percentile.
Supports delta cTnI assessment below 99th percentile in non-AMI ED patients; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: Knowing the intra-individual variation (CVi), also termed within subject biological variation, of an analyte is essential to properly interpret apparent changes in concentration. While there have been many studies assessing the CVi of cardiac troponin (cTnI), they have been limited in looking at CVi in different settings, and there is no data available on whether CVi might change in different settings. METHODS: We used our large cTnI data bank to look at the CVi of cTnI in Emergency Department (ED) patients who had an acute myocardial infarction event excluded. We looked at the effects of gender, age, climatic season, and time between samples to assess whether CVi changed. To assess the effect of age, after exclusion, we collected two samples from each subject for each study which were used to calculate the CVi between those identified groups. There were 139 males and 98 females aged <65 years and 109 males and 98 females aged ≥65 years. For gender and season, there were 122 males and 94 females in the summer period and 126 males and 102 females in the winter period. To assess long term variation there were 195 males and 153 females who had further admissions after more than 12 months. RESULTS: For the four variables listed, there were no significant differences in within individual variation (CVi), but there was a significant difference in between individual variation (CVg) for men and women with regard to age. The Index of Individuality (II) was <0.20 for all conditions studied. We noted that >90% of subjects had an reference change value (RCV) <9 ng/L. CONCLUSIONS: Because troponin concentration in patients without an identified cardiac condition change so little, delta changes are potentially of great value in assessing patients in the ED. Significant delta changes in troponin can occur without the 99th percentile being exceeded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koerbin et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Emergency Department patients with acute myocardial infarction excluded (n=444). Observation of cardiac troponin I was evaluated on Intra-individual variation (CVi) of cardiac troponin I. Intra-individual variation of cardiac troponin I did not significantly differ by sex, age, season, or time between samples, with >90% of subjects having a reference change value <9 ng/L.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: