Key result
Interacting drugs with apixaban are not linked to recurrent VTE or bleeding in cancer patients.
Why the study?
It is unclear how drug interactions with apixaban influence recurrent VTE and bleeding outcomes in cancer patients.
Does the concurrent use of interacting drugs influence the risk of recurrent VTE or bleeding in cancer patients treated with apixaban?
Population
298 cancer patients with VTE treated with apixaban
Comparison
Concurrent interacting drugs vs no interacting drugs
Design
Post hoc analysis of a single-arm interventional clinical trial
Follow-up
36-month follow-up period
Authors
Loading...
Concurrent interacting drugs appear compatible with apixaban in cancer VTE; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Observational (n=298)
Yes
Does the concurrent use of interacting drugs influence the risk of recurrent VTE or bleeding in cancer patients treated with apixaban?
Effect estimate: OR 0.95 (95% CI 0.38-2.4)
Absolute Event Rate: 9% vs 9.5%
In cancer patients treated with apixaban for VTE, concurrent use of most potentially interacting drugs did not significantly influence clinical outcomes, though fluconazole may increase the risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding.
Svalastoga et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Cancer with venous thromboembolism (n=298). Drugs expected to increase both bleeding and thrombosis risk (concurrent with apixaban) vs. No interacting drugs was evaluated on Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.38-2.4). Concurrent use of potentially interacting drugs with apixaban did not significantly influence the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (OR 0.95) or bleeding in cancer patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: