Why the study?
Does multiple coronary stenting provide safe and effective clinical outcomes in patients with unstable angina?
Does multiple coronary stenting provide safe and effective clinical outcomes in patients with unstable angina?
Multiple coronary stenting in unstable angina can be performed with high procedural success and results in good long-term event-free survival.
Suggests multiple stenting feasibility in unstable angina; leaves open randomized confirmation of safety and efficacy.
We examined clinical outcomes in 110 consecutive patients with unstable angina who underwent multiple coronary stenting over a 32-mo period. The main outcome measures were death, stroke, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, and repeat angioplasty. The angiographic success rate was 100%, and the procedural success rate was 96%. There were no in-hospital deaths and five (4.5%) patients had a myocardial infarction prior to discharge. There were four (3.6%) stent thromboses with one (0.9%) patient requiring urgent bypass surgery and two (1.8%) requiring repeat angioplasty. At late follow-up (11.9+/-7.1 mo), there was (0.9%) death and three patients (2.8%) suffered myocardial infarction. Three (2.8%) patients underwent late bypass surgery and five (4.6%) had a repeat angioplasty. At follow-up, 86% of patients were event free. We conclude that multiple coronary stenting in unstable angina may be performed with a high procedural success rate and good long-term outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chauhan et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: