Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the current study, we applied self-determination theory to explore a potential explanation for how instructors’ intellectually stimulating behaviors might influence student motivation. Undergraduate student participants (N = 418) responded to a questionnaire regarding their instructors’ teaching behaviors and perceptions of their own of engagement, frequency of student-to-student academic support, self-efficacy for learning, and intrinsic motivation to learn. Results from a structural regression model revealed that intellectual stimulation had a direct effect on students’ intrinsic motivation as well as an indirect effect through the mechanisms of volitional student engagement, self-efficacy for learning, and supportive peer relations. Results from our study indicate that intellectually stimulating instructional behaviors are associated with educational outcomes such as engagement, peer relations, and self-efficacy, and thus promote students’ optimal development by fostering intrinsic value and a sense of fulfillment associated with learning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: