Why the study?
Does lifelong vigorous endurance training attenuate the decline in VO2max with aging in male cross-country skiers?
Cohort (n=68)
Does lifelong vigorous endurance training attenuate the decline in VO2max with aging in male cross-country skiers?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.1% vs 8.1%
p-value: p=0.003
Lifelong vigorous endurance training attenuates, but does not completely stop, the age-related decline in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max).
The aim of the study was to assess longitudinal changes in cardiorespiratory function in different groups of current or former endurance trained male cross-country skiers. Three different age groups (n=122) took part in a similar study in 1976. Of 86 men still alive 78 responded (90.7%). Thirty-two from group I (age 58.7+/-2.3) and 36 from group II (age 74.5+/-2.5) participated in a maximum exercise test. We found significant difference in decline in VO2max between age groups (%/decade: 6.7+/-3.6 vs 13.9+/-3.2; P=0.0001 and in L/min/decade: 0.32+/-0.18 vs 0.53+/-0.14; P=0.0001). Men in group I (but only a tendency in group II) who were still competing and reported unchanged training patterns had a significant attenuated decline in VO2max (%/decade: 4.1+/-3.7 vs 8.1+/-2.8; P=0.003 and L/min: 0.19+/-0.0.17 vs 0.39+/-0.15; P=0.004). This study shows that lifelong endurance training does not stop the decline in VO2max with ageing, but vigorous training is important to attenuate the decline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grimsmo et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Current or former endurance trained male cross-country skiers (n=68). Vigorous endurance training (unchanged training patterns) vs. Reduced or former training was evaluated on Decline in VO2max (%/decade) (p=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: