Key result
Upstream Impella hub-and-spoke models for AMICS achieve ~74% 30-day survival, but pre-revascularization transfer predicts mortality.
Why the study?
AMICS carries 40%-50% short-term mortality, and protocolised hub-and-spoke network care with upstream mechanical circulatory support is gaining global traction.
Does a protocolised hub-and-spoke model with upstream Impella support improve survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock?
Cohort (n=31)
Yes
Does a protocolised hub-and-spoke model with upstream Impella support improve survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock?
A protocolised hub-and-spoke model with upstream Impella support for AMICS yielded a 74% 30-day survival rate, suggesting potential benefits of this systematic approach.
Should not yet change AMICS practice; leaves open whether protocolised upstream Impella improves survival.
BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) confers short-term mortality of 40%-50%. Protocolised network management of AMICS patients as part of a hub-and-spoke model supported by upstream mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is gaining traction globally to treat AMICS. METHOD: We conducted a prospective multicenter study in Melbourne, Australia describing our 5-year experience utilizing a protocolised hub-and-spoke model of care for patients with AMICS supported by planned upstream use of Impella CP (Abiomed, Danvers, MA). RESULTS: From December 2019 to August 2024, 31 patients were treated for AMICS with Impella MCS support. Median age was 60 years and 87% were males. ST-elevation myocardial infarction accounted for 84% of presentations, and 29% were complicated by cardiac arrest. The majority of patients treated were in SCAI-CSWG stage D (52%), and stage C (26%) shock. Upstream Impella prior to PCI occurred in 84% of patients. The 30-day survival rate was 74%. An adverse event occurred in 39% of patients. Device-related complications were due to hemolysis (32%) and arrhythmia (3%). Escalation of MCS support was required in five patients (16%). Multivariate analysis identified patients requiring transfer to the hub center prior to revascularisation as an independent predictor of mortality (OR 13.2 [1.34-129.3] p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: In this first protocolised hub-and-spoke model of care for AMICS supported by planned upstream use of Impella in Australia, 30-day survival was high compared to published historical rates. Patient and device-related complication rates were low. Expansion of the hub-and-spoke model for the treatment of AMICS appears warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Backhouse et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) (n=31). Protocolised hub-and-spoke model with upstream Impella CP was evaluated on 30-day survival rate. A protocolised hub-and-spoke model using upstream Impella for AMICS achieved a 74% 30-day survival rate, with transfer prior to revascularisation predicting mortality (OR 13.2, 95% CI 1.34-129.3).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: